Tuesday, June 25, 2013

MY LOVE-HATE RELATIONSHIP WITH A COMMUNICATION MEDIUM CALLED FACEBOOK


[Keywords: Facebook, advertisement, alphabets, Arabic, bylaws, Canada, censorship, communication, copyright, English, etiquette, evolution, France, French,  friendship, grammarians, guardians, Hausastan, India,  Language, liability, linguists, media,  moderator, neophytes, Oliverian, parlance, pharming, phishing, press, rebels,  scamming, shorthand, spying, Sri Lanka, telephone, vulgarity/uncivilized language, world, writing,]

Introduction
When darkness envelops the earth, keen eyes see the real colors of true men. If you do not want to see savage justice of men in the 21st century, do not take delight in having a daily dose of videos and pictures posted on the Facebook. This equally applies to YouTube, Instagam, Wiki, LinkedIn, Twitter and you can fill in the gaps.

Reviews
Apparently there are no rules, bylaws, laws, etiquette or guiding principles to be followed in some of the media enumerated above. You just enter; do your things whether orderly or higgledy-piggledy and get out. When you complain of the vulgarity or selfishness or what you see and hear, you are told to pack your bag and baggage and get out of there.  You may get out or stay at your own risk. I stoically chose to stay after being initiated into it by the mother of my goddaughter in BG. If I were being roasted on spits it was all my level-headed choice. You are asked to post what you have, say what you think and feel no matter how ridiculous, constructive or damaging it is to yourself, other peoples, now or in the future. It is a dungeon of canker warms where you do not care a damn. That is freedom of speech and the sort of journalese that we are to see from now henceforth as today everyone is a reporter, trained or dilettante.  When you turn it on you have emerging from all corners of the world all toms, dicks, and harries wanting to be your friend. Thus it is a good phishing and pharming ground for the CIA, NSA, All the spying and mushrooming marketing agencies in the world. The gallimaufry of overwhelming mega data traffic is a good sign for the founders or owners as they have audiences or clienteles that cost them next to nothing for their adverts and other sinister projects. It is better than the dynamic CNN that throws away seasoned readers every week, the conservative FOX TV, Al Jazeera English where the Arabs want to revamp the grandeur that was Arabism, World Press from the next nuclear super power Iran that specializes in bashing Westerners, BBC that is losing its initial uncensored trajectory and many more that may and do ask for an arm and leg to put your advertisement in the market. The danger of lack of filter is that adults and toddlers do mingle and you cannot differentiate adults from children. The insinuating question is how dare you minors enroll with adult clubs? Nothing is done about it and will not be done until it spirals out of all proportion, until the society has deteriorated beyond Sodom and Gomorrah where men and infants exchange pictures, drawings and videos of private parts, harmful sciences and paragons burnt and basked in public bonfires.

Fishing for Friends and Foes
The moment you are in, you got out to capture many friends as you want to have. As you are looking for friends, others are looking for you. The more friends you have the better for you feel fulfilled and you are happy. Happiness here is contagious.  Nonetheless, for lack of feeding facts, you venture into a no-man’s land where under normal circumstances you would not dare to forage for information whose sources and raison d’ĂȘtre cannot be checked. You will not mind being with glitzes or budding geniuses from India, Sri Lanka, Nigeria and occasionally mute East Europeans. Other forumites are happier when you are joining them with a galaxy of your friends, foes and your booties; call it new avenues or knowledge. They will benefit as they will have a wider fishing arena at no cost to advertise or do whatever they wish. There are others who represent corporations or conglomerate who masquerade as representing themselves yet they are all out to sound the inclinations of the customers so as to know precisely what to put in their itinerary basket of trade. They come to you on the chumming up day as your friends but that will be all you ever hear from them after the day of grace. There is no honeymoon period. They go straight into business. They want to woo you to gamble, and for men, they want to get them to gentlemen’s clubs where they can change ladies. This is not for free. It is business that must be sustainable. So, expect a fee in due course of time. With others, you will be with them for a year and they will never ever send you words of greetings even on your birthday that is glaringly put there for all to see. I have a phrase that best describe them, phishers, pharmers and masquerading enemies of friendship.

When you adamantly accept their friendship proposal, expect to have glaring cultural clashes if you do not want to be uncouth as some of them. I see very lonely people in crowds and very happy people mingling with welcoming crowds and getting into harm’s way.  I see confused people, enlightened ones suppressing their inner selves, I see gods, winged angels, and masquerading devils wearing green cloaks of amity using dynamites to force-enter peaceful homes in our hearts.  Some of their motifs are to destroy what we have built to right our wrongs and give us a modicum of heaven on earth we have been taught by Our Father to pray for since time immemorial. Yet we can only look on as their ways generate for us tons of money to keep some of us up with our kingly and queenly ways of life.   Often, the wages we have for our joining this forum is the fact that there are no principles or guiding rules to be followed.

Darkness of the Daylight
Is that the true manifestation of freedom we talk about in the free world? It is not all that negativity. As you will observe that we are operating in darkness and when it is dark, a keen eye can see the real colors of men. In consequence, the Facebook, YouTube, Instagam, and others space does not allow us to outline here are mirrors of our decadence in our societies. So we have to thank that global classroom media that help us to know who we are. We are by nature weak and evil peoples.

It will not be long before you are discussing houses, cars, motor bicycles you guys call now motorbikes, gorgeous blue lagoons in Greece and other serpentine scenic environs whose names the authors or posters do not even know and do not bother to know and will not know. Do not be over enthusiastic and curious as from the blue lagoons will emerge gorgeous and loving peoples, mermaids and mermen... Their bodies have no blemishes and plastic surgeons will go bankrupt in their field if we keep on producing elements like those.  It is because their pictures are burnished, polished and packaged in golden perfumed bags. Very soon the honeymoon period is over. Gradually it is tense to open the gift embalmed with golden coated papers. The revelations are dazzling or Pandora boxes.  If they do not suffocate you, they blind you. There is no win-win. Your McPhee, or whatever filtering devices you have installed to filter your messages and protect you will be unable to halt the phishing and pharming that is targeting you.  It all turns out to be like the new gadget buglers use now to enter all electronic cars. No car is safe and no member is safe. The replies or comments you send are sometimes wrongly interpreted. You are better off ignoring some comments or just click on the ‘like’ if at all you have time to kill.  Why? It is because you have suddenly become a square peg in a round hole. You may be in the wrong domain or you are a baby boomer hiding in children’s night club. If you still want to continue receiving junks, or tired, simply defriend, edit your list of so-called friends, morn over your spilling milk and stay. I passed through these to glean what I am sharing with you that may annoy or bemused you over my idiocy.

A lady once posted a picture of herself topless to comment. I commented that it had made me kinky and randy. To her, it was an awful reaction.  Remember that Americans have the eponymous “Randy” and in British, Canadian, Australian and Zimbabwean English that I know randy means eager to have sexual gratification, suffering from satyriasis, yearning to lay someone like a frustrated peacock after a peahen.  She was agitated and in wrath replied that such a reply was in bad taste as it was to infuriate members of her family that occasionally read her funny messages. It was a clear example of cultural clash. To me she was sensitive and I knew that it was to take me ages to try to convince her that I did not mean to annoy her. The next best thing that I could do was to defriend her. I did it and regretted it later. There I was missing a friend whose friendship I could only now conjecture where it could have led us to. There I was alienating myself from someone who was calling me a friend. With hindsight, she was not a friend but a pen –pal as baby boomers call such in the good old days. The question that I would ask is what would have happened if I had opened my heart to be allowed to bleed. It might have bled to death. My action was inadvertent or out of naivety. It had annoyed my friend; let us safely call her my pure acquaintance.

When many submit request to you for friendship or acquaintances, they look innocent. It will not be long before they are asking for favours. A lady in the States told me that she had just returned from a business trip in Lagos Nigeria. . When we next chatted she pulled a snake from the palm front. [This is an African expression where something unexpected suddenly sprung up]. It might be a jack in the pot. She told me that she was broke and needed some financial assistance from me. My head rose to Africa where one of the deputy ministers we were supposed to help his country turned round and asked me to lend him some money. I did not need to be told that these persons were telling me to get out of their ways. The lady requested $2000 US and I beamed and asked myself if I were already a banker.  I belayed the talk and did not defriend her but never chatted with her if she were online. Her story was fantastic and even Bill Gate would not have bought it. Gradually, I was learning the action of men when suddenly enveloped by darkness in a rich departmental store. Those of you from New York will recall when there was blackout. Managers turned round to steal. The baker and the baker’s wife stole. All saints with halos over their heads turned to be devils on that day. They stole what they euphemistically call bonanza.

New shorthand worse than Pittman’s
The parlance that is used is not even found in Mars or Pluto. It is extraordinary. It does not reflect the people’s profiles or the level of their erudition.  The English written is worse than what some Naijans, my Oliverians that is Nigerians, Indians and Sri Lankans speak or write in their forums and I often wondered if they were truly British Colonies.  I mean that it is worse than what one reads in the works of Jonathan Swift, Chaucer and William Shakespeare when they were gallanting this dusty earth and written English was not standardized or lacked accepted Grammatik. This was what Chaucer wrote when the Arabs and Turkish Muslims had barred Christians from going on pilgrimages to the Holy Land and the Christians in England had to be going to the Canterbury Cathedral instead:
Thanne longen fok to goon on pilgrimages,
And palmeres for to seeken straunge strondes,
To ferne halwes, couthe in sondry londes;
And specially from every shires ende
Of Engelond to Canterbury they wende

At least we can discern what our good old Chaucer was saying if you articulate the words. Often we have to ask our interlocutors in the forum what the heck they meant. You need patience of an angler to communicate with some of your frinzd [this is how they write it].

At some stage I became like Don Quixote and told myself that I was going to don in battle regalia and have a go at them. Here I was debased to think of the unthinkable. There are no standardized spellings, grammar, quotation marks, and so on. Forumites wrote as they felt and their vernaculars can be clearly seen in their spellings. Jonathan Swift’s way of writing in the Tale of Tub where he lampoons the papists, that is the Catholics who were against their king for luxuriating with his concubines were even better. I comprehended what he was saying than some of the tommy rots that are being spread on the WWW on the assumption of anonymity. Some forumites were philandering masquerades and did not know that anything once put on the WWW remains there forever and is read by at least a million persons.   I understood all but my eyes are not dazzled by the spelling and grammar. I am instead stupefied.  When Swift discussed Socrates, Pythagoras, Aesop and others the messages were clear as this false page. There was no standardization but all attempts were made to imitate the convention of the time.

The parlance of rebels
The Facebook written language, if at all there is something like that, to me is that of rebellious neophytes who do not want to have anything to do with convention. It takes us back to the beginning where I stated that it was all wishy-washy. One is tempted to say that it is a deliberate attempt to flush the Queen’s language into the toilet. I was tempted to ponder that it was a new call for a new way of writing to be found. Do we need to use conjunctions to string our words? Do we need the Roman script to write English? A Saudi Arab classmate copied his English class notes in Arabic scripts. I was simply amazed beyond words when he read it back to me in impeccable English. I beam and said to myself that English could have been using Arabic script. If English speakers were using the Roman scripts and Arabic numerals why could they not use Arabic script provided it portrayed the message succinctly and without falsification we are talking about. See how awful it is when the French force it to their Languedoc. Let me be puerile. Varieties of French written in the Roman alphabet is full of clumsy hats and caps some modern users do not bother to wear or insert them.  Having said this, there should be no room for laziness in language learning and writing if not it could become an archival language only or torpedoed and sunk as other dialects that have died or are fast dying.  With this trend of thought, linguists ought to ascertain that learners do not give back to them ersatz stuff, written or spoken.

Makeup over penmanship
The founders of Facebook have put the value of looks over that of penmanship. In Jonathan Swift I could recognize panicky, prettie, prathee and many more but the penmanship of Facebook forumites is just sloppy and awful. Do not tell me that it is more of Pittman’s Shorthand? Briefly, it is an unfiltered comedy of concoction. The English language that is fast becoming globalized is being butchered and I am afraid that the guardians of that language in Oxford or Cambridge will not want to shake hands with some of the Facebook patrons. My observation is that English is being prostituted by nonchalant speakers and learners. It should not be the case. When you want to learn a language, you have to do so with all your might and master all its knocks and crannies. Sit over it when you graduate and never let it sit on you.  I recall the early days of the Skype that faltered when it was about to blossom when one communicated so well. Some of the users boasted of exhibiting our prowess in typing speed without errors. We bragged of chatting up with a dozen users simultaneously because of our touch-typing skills.  'Facebookers’ owing to their lack of skill invented their spellings; let us call them shorthand that could make lexicographers, phoneticians or specialists in Esperanto run helter-skelter. Others could jump from the River Avon suspension bridge rather than see what is budding. The following are some of what they write and I will leave them to you to decipher their meaning. Cu, u, Ru, Ur, gn9th, b4, ya, kk, ya, h r de girlz, boyz, grts 2 all, fer, der,  ba, gud, and so on and so fifth.

Facebook as a great man’s homestead
Let me be honest with you. The Facebook is a great man’s house. When you play any tone in such a man’s homestead, there is ever someone to dance to it. It is so because is it peopled by many a man with contrasted characteristics, idiosyncrasies. It is for this reason that you do not judge them by their color but by their content. That is why I have CNN, BBC, Al-Jazeera, National Geographic, and many more striving to have a footing in it. Therefore you have a club where the rustics rub shoulders with the gentry. You will see a gorgeous lady who claims that she is promoting information technology (IT) at some University in America but in fact she is an international slattern. She posts different pictures in which she is semi naked asking men to approve of her beauty. There is never shortage of men who would mark “like” several times over and over. One asked oneself how beneficial such rating exercises were to her pictorial prostitution.  Post an article that some of you may consider as gutter press caliber and no one will make any comment about it.  Is the reason that they are unable to read or they do not want to enter into any confrontation or academic gymnastics? We can insinuate more from their silence.

Burlesques in vogue
Nevertheless, there is something that you cannot seal your month from verbalizing, when you see uncensored macabre pictures or videos. How can you afford to be apathetic when an elderly couple is videoed being set on fire and being whipped by a crowd that looks like East Africans? They are eventually burnt alive by the crowd with leaves of eucalyptus. The pains, the anguish, the hardheartedness of the burners, the fact that there are children in the crowd reveal to us the dark interior world we are living in and where we are heading to if there is no restraint. Today, I am seeing another macabre picture of a lady burnt by her husband at several places by a hut iron. This is downright violent against women that the male dominated world stood and watches each day in India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Ghana, Democratic Republic of Congo, The Sudan, Russia, Mexico and the rest and nothing is done. Do men really think? Do they all know that they are women’s children?
 If you think that what I have described is frightening, you are mistaken. We have seen fetuses dumped somewhere in India. I could not comprehend and I asked the person who posted the pictures and the author shied to tell me. One person in the audience told me that they were found in the dump yard in India. No name was given. I know that with modern cameras with built-in global positioning system (GPS), and the fact that dates are inscribed digitally in them, we could track down the photographer, the time and date where it was taken. Thanks to this technology. Then we do not have time to go through this exercise. Subscribers will do us a favor of simplifying location and dates for all of us if at all they want to make a contribution in our information broadcast. 
Today, I saw another that made me dumbfounded.  A naked man in some South East Asian country being excoriated stoned with bricks on the highway in what looked like India. From the ferocity of the attackers he was to breathe his last.  I held my head in my hands and asked what wrong that man committed that the police would not come to rescue him from the jaws of hell fire of what looks like school children whose hearts had been poisoned by their instructors and nonchalant adults. What I am painting here is just the tip of the iceberg. You are going to see pogroms with your naked eyes as you see happy weddings. Now I want to ask if Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the United Nations Organization (U.N.O.) does his work properly. I also want to add if there are NGOs interested in human rights extant in this world. 
It should be made loud and clear that any member of the U.N.O. whose citizens are being mistreated, be they the Boko Haram  followers arrested or hoodlums in Nigeria they had to be judged and sentenced and not allowed to be sentenced in the public by the mob that take the laws in their hands. If such were to happen as in Cameroon where the men in uniform sometimes stand and watch culprits dishing out jungle judgments  they could be expelled from the U.N.O., club of civilized men. Economic or some sort of sanctions should be imposed on such barbaric countries with appalling human rights records.

Exhume not the ugly past
If you think that was all, you are still mistaken. Women pose in their birth day attire or post picture of men having dalliance with them. Now there is a question for all of us. As believers, unbelievers, law abiding citizens, God fearers, and others of other beliefs, you are not allowed to show explicit documents, forbidden pictures to children. The Facebook, and similar forums are looking for money with blood, sweat, and tears without remorse as they know that the  burlesque the accepted subject matter,  the more patrons they woo and that is “successful” business. As there are no restrictions, what are supposed to be in the matrimonial bedrooms is exposed by exhibitionists in the global arena.  What are we teaching those children? Is that what our elders taught us? Or are you going to tell us that the elders or grandees are of the past world? Whoever told you that our world was different from theirs? We are a continuum and should strive every day to do all we can to be morally better than what we were in the past. I call those exhibitionists international prostitutes. Correct me if my definition is awry. Of what good is a Russian strumpet’s nude picture in the house of an American? Randy men may approve but the chances of such a woman being with a sexually frustrated American are one to a million. Also, once a sex worker, the tendency to revert this previous profession after marriage is high. You do not want to get yourself involved with such if you want to have a peaceful life in the future.  Following up is worthless speculation.

I have earlier stated that if you want to hide anything on earth for some person put it in writing. I tell you that nude pictures and videos of men and animals attract more audiences than treatises. Is this signally the death of writing as known since time immemorial? We are seeing the next generations surrounded by electronic gadgets that solve all their problems. They no longer read now or translate as Bing does it for them. Students cheat now by writing essays in their vernaculars and the computer translate for them and they pass on to their instructors as having done their homework. Let us leave that for another topic.  So the founders of Facebook must pat themselves on the back as having done their psychological homework before launching it and they will go a long way before it is competed away by Linkln and others. I am not saying that everyone should read and write. Reading and writing is not for all and sundry as university education. After all, a good number of geniuses, inventors and others with notoriety as Master Edward Snowdon who is presently hiding in an executive airport lounge at Moscow turn out to be college dropouts. Nevertheless a modicum of seasoned academics could clean the world of some of the misunderstanding and the filthiness that we see on the WWW.

Pictorial versus written media
I was inclined to say that the level of education had something to do. By merely looking at a picture, you cannot decipher the black boxes of what make the engines or computers tick. You got to go inside and see the nitty-gritty of all their composition and their working. That makes the difference between one who wants to advance and one who is careerist. If you want to experiment, post or share my write-up this afternoon and you will have not up to five persons browse it. But post a picture of German shepherds mating as on Youtube and you will have half a million viewer in less than one week. Ask what viewers have benefited from such burlesque? Ask me what you have benefited from reading up to this juncture. Similarly, what do slatterns get from posting their pictures nude or semi-nude and asking men to approve them? The men who comment are generally married and I do not think they would want to open their doors to strumpets. By making this statement, I am not claiming that whores are not normal persons like you my cherished readers but it is their dangerous work that is problematic. We may equate them here to smokers of tobacco who know the danger from cancer yet continue and puff and puff smoke asking us to give them marks for smoking so well. Or gluttons who eat like epicureans yet continue to do so in spite of warning from the surgeon general.  Whatever, God asks us to love them as Mary Magdalene in the scripture but do we do wrong things as our way of soliciting sympathy from onlookers? Then we are simply moronic. We have a choice.

Not all are casual or fair weather friends
Also, do not dismiss all that is there, it is the trend. After a while something is going to come up and many will abandon this euphoria. However be careful as some are really out to get friends for life particularly your East Europeans, Asians and Africans members. Getting a husband after Grade 12 may be difficult for some people where there are no arranged marriages. Some persons are not even comfortable with E.Harmony, Christian Mingle, and Roosk and so on. So do not philander and some outside persons are there with seriousness of purpose and they may hang on your nick even though they are thousands of miles away from Canada or America. Also, it must be borne in mind all the time that there are devils masquerading behind Jesus Christ’s or God’s or whoever their beliefs’ leaders are to phish or pharm you. They are angels with real wings who turn out to be Lucifer, sycophants. There are girls with three thousand friends. These were not twitters but real followers. Send them a message and it will lie in their in pigeonhole for one year without being looked into. When they are overflowing they simply delete them. You are only acknowledged as a friend at the day of inauguration and that is all.  Ironically, the girl or chap who has three thousand friends in real life does not talk to her next-door neighbours even her good old friends in her school days or if I talk to mine. Do not ask me if the writer of Tom Brown’s School Days ever communicated with his school dudes. That is immaterial.

Some Revelations
Now, I am talking of things concerning moral values. The mere fact that this is surfacing is going to offend many a readers, believers or unbelievers. I am glad there are some that will approve of what the pastors or priests or people of God are saying. The naked truth is that the road to hell fire is paved with gold and all goodies imaginable and that to heaven is paved with spikes or pilings. I see a brave new world emerging in the future and ways of communicating not referred to in George Well’s 1984. It will be more than three dimensional pictorial and a metamophosizing of persons you want before you. Distance will be out of the equation. You will touch and feel them as if you were with them but their real bodies will be far away. That will lead me to revelation about myself. My first shocking experience of Skype was when a mademoiselle in Taiwan asked us to make love on Internet. Today, I am still puzzled as when she transmitted the message to me. The conundrum is still spinning my head round after years as when I received the message. Now it is the Facebook, Skype, Instagam, MSM, Youtube, Wiki, Twitter and many more in the pipe line fighting for space as Christian fought for space in the past to get Jerusalem and as Boko Haram and Al-Qaida are fighting to throw Westernism out of the Christians, Middle East, S.E. Asia and Nigeria rightly Oliveria or the Northern Hausastan some of its elements are mourning over the fact that they have to deposit £3000 in Her Majesty’s Treasury when they apply for a visiting visa to enter the UK. The human being imitate as a survival stratagem. A million such things as Facebook will blossom and what will happen is still unimaginable. I will live that for those who are able to conjecture and turn to fruition their dreams.

Scamming
The good thing with Facebook is that you do not have a Mr. Abdoulaye of 419 from Burkina Faso, Nigeria (Oliveria), Mrs. Theresa Smith from Sierra Leone or Ivory Coast telling you that his parents were killed during the civil war and it was discovered that they had $18,000,000 US in a bank account in Geneva and they would appreciate it if you could accept to be the beneficiary of that amount by accepting to bank part of it for them in the North America, Australia, or Europe. They ask for your phone number and then an address to post you a present at you birth day. Those are scamming and never ever divulge such information.  Only morons fall into such traps. Having said this, people do try to pass viruses or bogus business deals on Facebook. Watch out for junks and just or never ever get involved as from the history of inception of Oliverian 419, no persons had ever benefited from it. Then you will point me one person who is happy with the telephone companies’ operating in Canada where a single telephone bill per month equals one month’s salary of a hardworking person in Congo. They all siphon money from clients who do not have ample choices and pamper them with apologias and persuasive arguments call business acumen  You can see the adage that darkness does not come before men clean their anuses with their hands that are clean during the day.

Discussion
The use of uncivilized languages, grotesque pictures, burlesque writings, paintings and videos have made me to ask if there were no moderators or if it was deliberate to allow subjects discussed or posted un-moderated. That also triggered the subject of copyrights.  Patrons who post some pictures are not the owners of them. They are pirated or expurgated. They stumbled upon them, copy and pasted them. They have never heard of intellectual dishonesty and piracy! Or is this sort of piracy overwhelming and it is now ignored since it is now dominated by the Chinese also in the manufacture of all commodities? Do they know the cost of composition or production of some original pictures or drawing or literature? The authors spent sleepless nights, days and even weeks or months to capture those pictures and patrons just copy and paste them and claim credit for them. How did I discover that there was serious copyright infringement? I would ask those who have posted the picture to tell me the story behind them and they just shied away. Other just thought that they were interesting after they have copied and added on some flourishes. They are not the original authors and this is still piracy or intellectual dishonesty. If we allow these to continue, would we not be killing gradually initiatives for invention or creation? Let us ponder upon this point. Have the owners of some of the media or forums ever heard of copyright infringement and that defaulters could pay all they ever earned for it?  We briefly mentioned abusive languages that often come up. Can one sue a patron for the use of offensive or abusive or uncivilized language, pictures or whatever against one? Furthermore, we understand that users are not forced and as I once complained and I was told off that I was not obliged to stay on Facebook if I was not interested in the content of what was posted. What of responsibility and liability in the case where a member is abused by another member? Will the responsibility be shouldered by the owners of Facebook or the member who had used uncouth language? All these could be things of the past if members respect one another and follow led-down regulations. Who will police such rules? The point is that there is no guarantee where strangers with greatly diversified background meet and one does not expect another to step on another’s toes. Additionally, if I were operating it, I would ask for people not to share personal messages. If one wants to chat with person A, the content of their conversation should not be broadcast to all members or associate members. That is irrelevant and waste of time and efforts.  Lastly, it has been observed that some members do not have domiciles and true names and write or sent their flowers and pictures of their dogs, cats, chimpanzees, snakes, stable dishes in members’ geographical regions and others anonymously. My apprehension is that those people may have sinister plans. I defriend them. What of other clients? A rotten borough  would be welcomed as one will be associated with a place be it Antarctica, Berlen, Durban, Hong Kong,  Timbuktu, Ottawa, Okavango, Vibank, Nanfang, Vladivostok, Brazilia, New York, Visale, Victoria,  Kumbo, Ngong or Dar es Salaam.

Finales
The message I am passing is clear like this day light. Whatever you do as your survival strategy, protect the future. Let those who are coming after you cross the very bridge you used to traverse the turbulent river of life. Do not cut the bridge after crossing it.  Remember to always have a place in the government for the sensitive and the insensitive. I learn one rule as a FIFA soccer referee not long ago in Geneva, that the umpire is there to protect the weak from the able-bodied players. Inventors and business persons, remember that after you the world will still go on. You do not even know the date of the big bang. Remember that the dinosaur and the dodo disappeared and many others but the world will still go on with more and better inventions than what you are toying on with now.   At long last I know what you are thinking: You are asking me what on earth took me to the Facebook when it was suggested by my goddaughter’s parents in Bulgaria. If you do not know by now you will never know. However there is one penultimate thing I will tell you. I went there to see faces but I can be candid with you that you sometimes see more buttocks than faces.
Dr. Viban Viban Ngo,

Friday, June 14, 2013

DECLARARION OF THE BISHOPS OF CAMEROON ON ABORTION, HOMOSEXUALITY, INCEST AND SEXUAL ABUSE OF MINORS

Before you read the main article below, I will urge you to read some of my observations. Often the living are of the impression that they created life and doing what they want with life is their right. This apparent freedom has gone out of all proportion. Today we are not questioning why we are in this world and if at all there is life after this one. We are saying that life is accidental and we and other creatures have just evolved. These believe that after this life, it is all for them.  That is sickening for those who talk and see the Maker of this world and all that are there every minute. The religious and many of us go out of our ways to promote the veracity of life after death and the fact that God who made us is there for us and had his Son died even for us and has and will ever be with us even if we go astray. I am concerned with those who go astray and as Jesus Christ is, was and will ever be. Heretofore, I was concerned with men who cannot live a normal life for reasons those of us who are supposed to be normal cannot comprehend. We dabble with the topic and that is our way of saying that we are concerned and wondering if there is a leeway to what we see as a melee. We do not want to be swellheaded and claim that we have a panacea for homosexuals and lesbians that were not accepted in the past and still grudgingly today and many more abnormalities that are and will be. We are not just concerned with all that would touch life and disturb us but the generations to come after us. 

We dabble with what we call pure sciences and some of us believe that we accidentally mushroomed on earth owing to some accidental fusion of chemicals and that the issue of God making us and other creatures on earth is bunkum. In this vein, there are proponents of those who vehemently believe that they own their life and can do whatever they want with it. Their spurious arguments are strongly put so that marginal Christians and other believers are sometimes convinced. Some women similarly believe that they own their lives and can do whatever they want with their bodies and what are put and removed out of them. They can get impregnated at any time and abort the fetuses that are in their wombs at will. They determine for themselves when life begins and when it should end at their convenience. They succeed and are doing them for their earthly gratifications.  Some even do them and at their advanced ages when they cannot have children, they go on to adopt those fetuses, now people that had been preserved by those who value life. This is all arrant.

Today, June 14, 2013  Quebec, the predominantly French speaking Province of Canada, North America is endorsing euthanasia. They are not the first nor the last. Euthanasia is what others call mercy killing of an individual who may be suffering as a way to alleviate his or her pains. I see Malthusian theory of population control coming in to play at our age. We will control population explosion by vice and this is what is happening. If we kill to alleviate pains of a terminally ill person, we still kill and taking away a human life is a cardinal sin. It is killing downright and an individual who partakes in this cannot claim that he or she did not kill and should not have any compunction. 
Dr. Viban Viban Ngo


DECLARARION OF THE BISHOPS OF CAMEROON ON ABORTION, HOMOSEXUALITY, INCEST AND SEXUAL ABUSE OF MINORS


We, the Bishops of the Roman Catholic Church which is in Cameroon, gathered in Sangalima, during the 36th annual seminar of the Bishops of Cameroon from 5 to 12 January 2013,
Aware of the general climate of permissiveness, forgetfulness of God, of creation, of nature as God created and intended it for our happiness, a climate experienced and resisted by families and against which they courageously protect and defend themselves, upholding human and divine values,
After having noted the proliferation and the normalization of induced abortions in our country, despite current legislation,
Nothing also, with pains, that under the pretext of the respect of human rights and the principle of non-discrimination, international organizations tend to impose on African countries and on the world, legislation for the recognition of sexual orientations contrary to nature, our culture and our faith, such as homosexuality, gay marriages with the possibility of adoption of children by these “couples”,
Deploring also the increase in our cities, our neighborhoods, our villages and families of victims of incest often linked with a permissive mentality and the presence of networks that impose inhuman practices which are against nature, despicable and criminal; without leaving out numerous abuses of minor,
Taking into account the plan of God for the whole creation, the humanism which derives from it, his infinite mercy for the sinner and our mission of the salvation of the whole person and of every man in Jesus Christ,
In the name of the Church, expert in humanity, we, the Bishops of Cameroon unanimously declare the following:
I - CONCERNING INDUCED ABORTION
.  Human life is sacred and inviolable from conception its natural end. It must be respected consistently and unconditionally (cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) no 2270)
. The human embryo has the dignity of the human person, Killing an embryo is killing a person and destroying life (cf. CCC no 227).
. Pregnancy is neither a decease nor a misfortune which must be disposed of, but the gift of life to humanity to be preserved with great care,
. Families, medical, social, civil and religious organizations should support families or couples disturbed by unwanted pregnancies, teenage pregnancies,  illegitimate or at risk from rape, to save these unborn children and give them human life.
. Religious communities, social organizations, schools and universities, families must arrange and consistently prevent induced abortion through education and sensitization of young people, families and society as a whole.
.  To Christians, we ask to read once more in ecclesial communities, families, associations, schools and universities our Pastoral Letter on abortion of 1979 that still retains its relevance: “Respect the life of the child  who is not yet born. Be faithful to God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ who loves all men, and especially the weak and the helpless” (p.20)
. To abort and to assist in committing abortion are crimes which are considered direct and voluntary killing of the human being. This is a grave sin punishable by excommunication whose absolution is reserved to the Pope, the Bishop of the place or priests authorized to act. (cf. CCCn o 1463).   The door of God’s mercy is always open, priests must accompany in prayer, ensure the spiritual and compassionate monitoring of those who come to reconcile with God and the Church
II CONCERNING HOMOSEXUALITY
. Homosexuality deals with men and women who experience sexual attraction exclusively or predominantly toward people of the same sex. The debate on homosexuality raises the question of sexuality and its dignity, its meaning; its language and its purpose.
. Given the multifaceted claims of the promoters of homosexuality; the right to legal marriage, adoption of children, founding a family, and medically assisted procreation etc…, claims which are based on several concepts whose main ideology of gender opposes the classical notions of family, gender and reproduction.
. For human dignity and salvation of all mankind in Jesus Christ,
We, the Bishop of Cameroon, unanimously declare the following:
. The Church, Mother and Educator teachers the sacredness of the sexual identity of the man and woman created in the image of God (Gen. 1, 26), the dignity of their sexuality and of their marriage which form basis of their family.
. The human person is created by man and woman “Male and female, he created them” (Gen 1, 26). This invariable difference is the basis of their relationship and their complementarity and this is fulfilled in marriage.
. Homosexuality falsifies human anthropology and trivializes sexuality, marriage and family as the foundation of society.  In African culture, it is not part of the family and social values.  It is a flagrant violation of the legacy which our ancestors, faithful to heterosexuality and the family have handed down to us.  Throughout human history, practices of homosexuality have never led to the evolution of society, but have always been the obvious signs of the outrageous decay of civilizations.  In fact, homosexuality opposes humanity to itself and even destroys it.
. The identity of sexuality is deeply misunderstood, misused, perverted outside conjugal relationship of man and woman.  Therefore acts experienced in the context of homosexuality are not << sexual >> but “relationships against nature” (Rom 1, 26).
. Marriage is an institution that legalizes sex and parentage for the foundation of a new family.  It is the union of a man and woman who agree to start a family and live together in love.  The homosexual union is not a marriage, it distorts the meaning of marriage by reducing it to a link that is sterile, hedonistic and perverse, “the infamy of man to man” (Rom 1, 26)
. Men and women have the natural right to assume the specificity of their nature, it is a right which is invariable, irreducible and structuring, and which can be understood only in the context of the couple, sexuality and the family as the basis of paternity for the man and maternity for the woman. The “liberal” orientation of sexuality brandish by the promoters of homosexuality is a denial of this law.
. Every child, boy or girl has the right to live his identity in connection with a mother and a father. Promoters of homosexuality who are clamoring for a law on adoption, want to ignore this primordial right which is necessary for the balance development of the child.
. In fact, homosexuality is not a human right but a disposition that seriously harms humanity because it is not based on any value intrinsic to human beings; <> (Lev 18,22) as evidenced by the biblical tradition of constant and perennial values in the face of voices against nature, for the tight to difference is only justified when it is founded on human values. 
Faithful to this constant teaching of the Magisterium which states that acts of homosexuality are intrinsically disordered and contrary to natural law (cf Catechism of the Catholic Church no 2357).
We, the Bishops of Cameroon, reiterate our disapproval of homosexuality and homosexual unions. On this subject we call, we call on all believers and people of good will to reject homosexuality and the     so-called “gay marriages” and to accompany those who are inclined towards homosexuality and homosexuals by means of prayer, spiritual follow up and compassion, in view of their conversion.
III – CONCERNING INCEST
Reported cases of incest in families are dramas of great suffering and deep despair. This plague brings about the deterioration of relations between relatives.
Faced with the moral evil of incest, a true human and social turmoil is taking on more and more momentum in our society.
Moved by the pastoral concern to protect and promote the family, and its human and spiritual values.
We, the Bishops of Cameroon, unanimously call your attention on the following:
·         Consanguinity is sacred,
·         Incest <> (CC no 2388). It is a violation of prohibited sexual relations and therefore marriage between two persons related by consanguinity that is to say, by natural kinship, legal kinship and by direct affinity.
·         The prohibition of incest is universal. Society planned it to strengthen family cohesion.
·         The Lord God forbids marriage between consanguineous Israelites (cf. 18, 6-18)
·         The Cameroon penal punishes incest (art. 360)
·         The prohibition of incest is a natural law,
·         Incest seriously destroys consanguinity and direct affinity and destroys the balance of the family.
·         Children born of incestuous relationships, suffer from an identity crisis that traumatizes their personality.
We strongly condemn:
        This horrible abomination that destroys the fabric of the family, denigrates its authors (cf. 1Co 5, 1ss), causes the curse of incestuous people (Deut. 27.20) and can cause misery and even death of the guilty if they are not purified (cf. Lv 20, 11).
We insistently urge:             
·          All families, tribes, ethnic groups have to scrupulously respect the consanguinity and affinity and to make known to their descendants the relationship between them.
·         The whole society and authorities in their diversity have to protect consanguinity, the foundation of the human family.
·         All the faithful, priests and religious have to accompany them in prayer, monitoring of spiritual and compassionate life of victims and perpetrators of incest for a new life in the Lord.
IV – CONCERNING THE ABUSE OF MONORS
·         Child Abuses are varied and thrive in our society. We denounce the theft and sale of children, all sexual abuses namely: pedophilia, rape, incest, sexual assault, indecent exposure, sexual harassment, child pornography, child prostitution. . . these outrages on a minor are unanimously condemned by the scriptures, nation and are punishable by law.
We the Bishops of Cameroon,
·In accordance with the legislation in force in our country, the African tradition so attached to the sacredness of the child,
·Following the particular example of Jesus Christ who blessed the children and recommended: “Beware not to despise one of these little ones” (MT 18,10) because what you have done to the least of mine, it is to me that you have done” (Mt 25,40)
·Unanimously condemn child abuse in all forms
·Urge the society to enhance the protection of minors at all levels, to denounce and fight firmly the perpetrations while providing medical care,
·Call on all the parents to cover their children with affection and respect, to ensure a good education and to preserve them from these abuses inside as well as outside of the family home,
·Ask educators to protect children, to inform them from these abuses that threaten them and on what to do against aggression.
Dear faithful of Christ who said: “I have come that they may have life and have it abundantly” (Jn 10, 10), let us be united from this 2013 Lent to protect and promote the culture of life in our country and around the world.
                                                                   Done at Sagmelima January, 12, 2013
                                                                   For the Bishops of Cameroon
                                                                   Mgr. Joseph Atanga
                                                                   Archbishop of Bertoua

Thursday, June 6, 2013

BEYOND COMMENTING ON HOMOSEXUALITY


Foreword
Key Words: homosexual, lesbian, marriage, partnership, philosophy, religion, God, politics, hermaphrodites, anthropology, procreation, economics, productivity, customs, persecution, sympathy ]


Homosexuality odd?
We will comment on the case of homosexuality by looking at some maverick biological cases we often come across that we cannot account for even with modern scientific wizardry at our disposal. Often times we would just examine and take no action as a whirlwind that would trigger panic in what we had considered as a buffered safe zone in our chorography. Alternatively our brainstorming to understand so as to decipher the oddity does not alter the situation that is not inherently our making. When the American natives, Indians, we now call the First Nation Peoples saw Christopher Columbus and his crew landed on their shores with huge ships and no oars, bemused, they simply call them birds of the sea. Though awe-stricken  they were frighteningly complacent. They could not engage them in any war for intruding or welcome them wholeheartedly without trepidation as they were aliens to each other.   In some parts of the tropics there occasionally appear from the wilderness, two headed puff adders or vipers. In  the past local artists captured them in works of arts since they had no photographic technology that proliferate Facebook and electronic media today. They employed what others presently see as primitive art mediums as records of their grandees and for grand events they neither recorded in their scripts nor phonographically. We now marvel these as works of art. However, they should not be viewed from the Western perception or aesthetic appreciation of art. They are Africans sacred records, some persons arrogantly or innocently call primitive works of art.  These are mavericks as the Siamese twins we unexpectedly get in our midst. No matter how grotesque and out of the ordinary they appear, we dare not destroy them. We give them ample space in our world we borrow from the Maker and do our entire maximum best to nourish and keep them alive....When you travel from the tropics where you have no cattle husbandry and abundance of milk to the temperate lands of the West, you get puzzled when you see children and the aged imbibe gallons of milk each day when that after weaning a child in the tropics that is the end of all that is called milk for him or her till the day they head to their Elysium. Knowing that our world is variegated we can now proceed to look at another case in our homes that some of us presently take now for granted yet it is still apparently a novelty in other traditions, the homosexuality and lesbianism.

Defining a  homosexual or a lesbian
In the human biological world, a homosexual is an individual that has feelings or sexual attraction to persons of the same sex. Contrariwise, a heterosexual is one who may have that sexual feeling to people of the opposite sex.  From my observation of homosexuals, men who have sex with men, (MSM), I have seen and heard from a distance, homosexuals’ voices and mannerisms are somewhat effeminate. If not of their male genitalia and physiognomies, one could mistake them from their voices for women. Nevertheless, that is not usually the case. Some have heavy male voices like some normal males. Here are some of the reasons that convinced me to be tempted to conclude that they were not normal persons or were just those that would be classified in the human biological hierarchy as missing-links. I conjectured further that they lacked some biological parts of their bodies that would make them fully human, that is like the heterosexuals. These could be in their brains that are psychological. Then the question was why there was a high concentration of them among the Caucasians or those with a strong Caucasian influence. Why there are not so many of them in S. E. Asia, Africa and among the First Nation Peoples of the Americas. I was tempted to ask if such behavior was related to the sort of diets, medicine or climate or the way society brought up their children or a combination of factors. It meant going to the complex field of research whose technical facilities I did not have. With my gullibility, I was examining them as when the first cousins of Africans looked at them when they met after living in separate climatic conditions for millenniums.  Some Caucasians even called the first Africans they saw noble savages and Africans in return called them sprites of once departed brothers and sisters.

As for women with this sort of biological inclination they are known as lesbians, WSWs. They behaved like men and emulate men in many ways and given opportunities they would even do away with all female parts of their bodies. They are haters of themselves for no reasons of theirs, for something they are born with that they themselves cannot explain. Again, from the biological perspective of procreation the whole gamut of mankind is akin to, the inability of an individual to tend to love but one of his kinds of the same sex is considered an abnormality.  Abnormal as an adjective is departing from what is normal.  Normal is general or customary. This may vary from region to region or society to society and there are several factors that may account for what is normal. Walking stack naked in some primitive communities may be normal but in most advanced societies, this may be interpreted as deviant or departing from the normal. People who are not normal may be considered as being mad and are further alienated in some normal communities. 

Politics, Deviance and forced conformity
Not long ago homosexuality was not overtly allowed. This is gradually changing particularly in the Western societies. Even then, there is still resistance from some conservative quarters and in some global churches. In some parts of the USA, some authorities endorse homosexuality and homosexual marriages just to engrave their names in the history of man as being sympathetic to their rights as individuals. http://www.dolifesitenews.com/news/1.4-million-march-against-gay-marriage-in-france-police-tear-gas-crowd-chil/ Others compromise this for money. For example, although being gay is not idiosyncratic of a town in Southern USA called New Orleans, when the organizers of gays and lesbians' parades offer handsome payments to the authorities of that city they are given green light to march on to satisfy curious crowds. It is true that a homosexual has feelings like anybody else, but the fact remains that they do not have coitus as average persons, hence limiting their procreation is that hard nut that many in the past and even hitherto have been unable to comprehend, crack or fathom. Many had in the past equated their lifestyle to sickness that could be cured. Many in that category of men are alleged to have been cured and that had been a sort of convincing evidence to many that it was a sickness that could be cured.

Sketches of Homosexuality in the Holy Bible and traditional Marriage
The Holy Scripture touches all sorts of sicknesses of man and animal and some yet to come but does not accept sodomy as a sickness, but as profanity, a sort of evil lifestyle. The following is what the Bishops of Cameroon Republic are saying that I will cite verbatim: 
"The identity of sexuality is deeply misunderstood, misused, perverted outside conjugal relationship of man and woman.  Therefore acts experienced in the context of homosexuality are not...; sexual …; but “relationships against nature” (Rom 1, 26).
Marriage is an institution that legalizes sex and parentage for the foundation of a new family.  It is the union of a man and woman who agree to start a family and live together in love.  The homosexual union is not a marriage, it distorts the meaning of marriage by reducing it to a link that is sterile, hedonistic and perverse, “the infamy of man to man” (Rom 1, 26)."
Jude 7 describes the dreaded Sodom and Gomorrah where prostitution, and MSM and women having sex with women (WSW) were common. In Corinthians 6: 9-11; Timothy 1:8-10; Romans 1: 18-32; Kings 23: 7; 15:24; 14:24 and Judge 19:16-24; and Leviticus 18: 22  homosexuality or lesbianism is equally discussed. We also have it discussed as early as in Genesis 19: 1-11. Punishment of death is dished out to people of the same sex who were caught having sex (Leviticus 20: 13.)" From my observation, a true homosexual is different person from the average man. We have not understood him or are not yet equipped with those technological facilities to explore and understand his inner thoughts, thus his deviant behavior.  Nevertheless, we have to accept him as a maverick in our midst but retrain from harming him or humiliating him as in the past. We have to sympathize with him but draw a line on the sand that he may not cross since his type of love relationship cannot be equated to that in heterosexuality unless by some miracle or some yet to be discovered medical props.The Bible acknowledges homosexuals and lesbians but does not accept their sexual activities. Therefore if a homosexual or lesbians were to be alone till he or she died, he was not to be prosecuted by the society or became a subject of the Devil but his or her procreation was to remain out of the equation. Of course, it would have been so as Jesus Christ came for all, pure men and evil ones. If all did not commit evil deeds, there would not have been any reasons of God sending His Son to save man from sin and hell fire. 

Additionally, abnormality is not only confined to men, creatures but to actions of men. Let us look at how one case is handled in Nso ethnic group in the former British Cameroons, Western Africa. Most of you are from societies where dexterous or ambidextrous were frown at and even shunned. It is still the case in some isolated primitive societies in the 21st century. In some societies, abnormal persons, lefthanders were coerced to be normal and you and I know that it was psychologically wrong. Some were damaged for life. Today, we all know the harm we did to those who were left handed. Today we have our Head of State, President Barack Obama of the most powerful nation on earth, USA who is a lefthander. The author of this write-up is ambidextrous. He was born a right handed person. That was what you will call the normal. Then after a ghastly accident in which he lost all his right fingers, he had no choice as a child but used his left hand for all activities. It took a long time for the right hand to heal that in the end he was so comfortable with his left hand. Then lefthanders as homosexuals were not accepted in his society as is still the case. The elders restrained him from using his left hand by tying on it heavy weights that he dared not extricate himself from. It was like being in a pillory and onlookers mocking at him for sins that he did not commit.  If rocks and heavy woods were not tied on his wrist to restrain him from using his left hand, they used solarium, vilun (Lamnso). If he insisted on using that his despicable left hand, he was smacked. At his semi preparatory school he was handed a pencil to write and dare him wrote with his left. He was smacked on the head, back and palms when it was bitingly cold in the mornings. The pains still rankle in his heart till today. He would try to cheat by handling the pencil with both my hands. Of course, that made him to write at a snail rate.  The teacher kept a good eye on him when it was writing and sport periods. He was beaten each time he made that  mistake of using his left hand. At last corporal punishment converted him. Today he writes with both hands but his left hand is still stronger and more flexible than his right hand. That is what his society did to for hin in order to accept him as a normal person. Is that what we want to with the homosexuals and lesbians in order to accept them in our midst? 

Man had passed through several phrases of his peregrination in what we call life on earth. He has gone through the thick and thin to be accepted and to accept himself. I remember when the black man was not accepted in some parts of the world because he was different from the rest. I remember when the Black and Arab Africans had to be schooled in in a special way in order to attain what was known as the French  or Portuguese or Spanish citizenship in the colonial days. In America, it was not long when the Black man was allowed to vote and share the same public bus and hotel with the White man. Up till 1994, peoples were racially segregated in the Republic of South Africa and even before in what used to be known as the North and South Rhodesia. Let me end at that as we will be tempted t write another treatise on segregation that pops up each day in our media. Today we look back and wonder if we ever had normal  brains.  We are now of a different paradigm of life. As a believer, I fervently opine that we have had some association with the Holy Ghost that has enlightened us. The crucial question is if It has it enlightened us to accept homosexuals as normal persons?  

Many we now call MSMs were persecuted and many were even killed for what they were born with if my interpretation is right! We are talking of more than 100 000. http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/online/hsx/ . This may be a conservative figure from Hitler's Germany alone. What of in Italy, and Vichy France during the Second World War? One day we will look at our foot prints in the history of man and ask if we were really the reasoning homo sapiens or just animals masquerading as civilized men. If we can scientifically prove that homosexuality is really extant,  it should be instilled in all normal persons that some men and women are born that way as I have been trying to day in my words. [I will end this section as Dr. Franz Fanon in 1952 in his work The Wretched of the Earth, p. 254: “The pretext of catching up must not be used to push man around, to tear him away from himself or from his privacy, to break and kill him.” The man in this context is the homosexual and his opposite, the lesbian.]

If the majority do not frown at right-handedness, it is because they have been used to since birth. In England many are puzzled that tropical persons  cannot even eat Cheddar cheese many take as a delicacy. When people from the Torrid Zone visit Africa on official visits they are seen wearing suits where Africans are comfortable going downright naked or scantily clad. We will look at an imaginary character called Mr. Chin Nshancarmfery. He visited Turkey and discovered that there were some men who wore gowns and blouses just like women in his country.  When he went to Scotland he found men wearing multicolored tartan skirts. He did not know if they were women masquerading as men or if they were just having fun. It was not just once but some wore these diurnally and went to work with it. When he went to America for the first time, he saw women wearing jeans trousers just like men. He had grown up used to men wearing nothing but gowns and skirts that extended below their knees. His head ran wild with comparison of what was innately his in his home town as in  Tin Tin in Congo by Herge. His discovery of heterogeneity did not end here. America   did bring to a close his peregrinations  He left the Democratic Republic of Congo to the abutting nation in the south called Zambia. He found men whose feet were like their hands. The toes were so long as their fingers and they were able to use them to handle comfortably liter size and even magnum size bottles full of a local brew they call shibuku. Such men could move well in the canopies of primeval rain forests. The irony was that they looked like him and were accepted in their locales. Then Chin went to the Middle East and  found out that people wrote copious literature on slates that they would wash the ink with water and drank so as to digest what they had read. "Strange idiosyncrasies," he concluded. When he visited the coast of West Africa he found out that women were going around semi-clad and they only had public hair covers over their genitalia. He could not take up his head to look at them for he was an exceptionally coy man. No one could conjecture what he was pondering but he has seen differences of persons.

He looked at both men and animals. He remained quiet for he was complaisant that if animals did not wear clothes, but had hair or firs and it was nature's way of clothing them for they could not reason as man to weave clothes to cover and themselves warm and be decent.  One commonality was coming out between man and other creatures. Men who were also a species of animals could not wear clothes as animals too . With this reasoning that man could not bother about clothes, he became normal when he visited Berlin for that matter and found men and women playing volley games in a specially allocated central park as they were born, called the nudists' park. Their penises were dangling and women’s kinks and buttons could be seen without inhibition. He inquired about the strange behavior. He gleaned that they were in their birthday suits and that what inhibited man from doing that always was their inclement, eerie and chilly weather. He was surprised that men did not have erection when they braced their penises on exceptionally beautiful women who were also playing in that park. On further inquiry, he was told that there were so many other parks of that nature dotted around the globe and that what used to be Christian countries were accepting the fact  of  going about naked. Well, he concluded that nudity was as old as man. The first man and woman on earth had no clothes and went around in their birthday suits as what other derogatorily call primitive communities in the Ituri Forest, Papua New Guinea, and the Amazon Forest in South America today.

The first siblings of the first man and woman in the world who were Africans intermarried. That is what we call inward breading, consanguinity. That relationship was incestuous and not accepted in most decent communities today. In certain part of India cousins intermarried. the effect on children of such intermarrying is left for you to explore. In certain West African communities, or ethnic groups it is strictly prohibited and defaulters are cleansed in a bizarre way and humiliatingly separated in the public bazaars.  The belief is that off springs of such a union are weak and cannot defend the groups in case of alien attacks.   Those who do it do not care so long as such marriage preserve the wealth of their families. 

In some communities it is normal for men to eat monkeys, horses, and all sorts of animals, others call bush meat in Bantu Africa. Some specialize in eating dogs, others cats, and a host of what we call in the West as pets. Some Chinese do this too. Those who relish these creatures do not have the word pet in their vocabulary as all animals are groomed to be eaten.

The anticlockwise climbers
Still on idiosyncrasies,  there are some climbers that would climb clockwise and that is the accepted and known ways for most agronomists and botanists. Then it has been discovered that there are some tropical root crops, yams that climb anti-clockwise. From a distance, they are the same as our normal and odd men and women, albeit, there are differences. They are unusual as our homosexuals yet they produce fat rooted yams that are in high demand for their nutritional values. They are protected as well as those that climb clockwise. The traits of gays and lesbians are that their fluids and eggs for procreation are wasted unlike these unusual yams.  Is this commensurate with the growth of population check by vice as once and other means advanced by Thomas Robert Malthus the theorist on population growth?

Where do we pigeonhole the Sexless by choice
What we have been examining is generally known as oddities. Do people who do not conform to the norm or who look different fall under oddities?  If they do, shall we consider homosexuals and lesbians under these categories? What of persons who grow up and are normal and have sexual drives but decide not for  religious reasons who stay single till they die? We also call them celibates. Most of you know of many. We have applied all sorts of terms in our arsenals of words to describe them. Others may not have that libido to carry out normal dalliance and may be helped by Viagra and related drugs that dominate CNN, NBC, and Bells' commercials for the sexless. Others chose this life style after having had their children and are under the pressure of work, work to pay bills as you will understand that most inhabitants in the West are debtors. For that reason wives and husband who cannot be satisfied this way at home go to the internet to be chummed up with people of their kinds who are out for ephemeral love without strings. In the past a woman who was exceptionally randy or kinky was not welcomed but that is normal today. Such satyrs are applauded today for living their lives so well. They do all they can to have sex. They dress provocatively to attract and have more partners than you will imagine. Men in return work so hard to the point of dying so that they can have more money to woo more women into their cells. Will a MSM do the same as normal persons? We will  attempt to answer this below.

Some Reviews of exceptional cases
When we look at homosexuality, heterosexuality or bestiality or abstinence, we are looking at men or living creatures from procreative perspective. We also look at differences in man's activities. A normal man always has feeling of procreating. You will see that most of what normal persons do is related to that procreation aptly handled by psychologists C.Jung and Sigmund Freud, http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_mental_health.html ). At conception we develop or evolve or assume innately that sexuality. If my understanding is right, a true homosexual is born and not bred. Then there are cases in areas frequented by some deviants where normal children or men are cajoled to take part in sodomy that in the past was punishable by death or imprisonment. These children as the case of the river port of Duala in Cameroon, Mumbasa in Kenya and Matadi in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) take part in sexual activities with homosexual seamen just to get good money to survive on. This is prostitution. These boys are not inherently homosexuals. They are heterosexuals but are cajole by money. They eventually find themselves having feelings for other men when their seasonal sailors or sex tourists have departed. They turn round to pay their other friends for such act. In this regard, they are not true homosexuals (MSM) but are coerced to be by circumstances we cannot safely say beyond their control. That is where the society gets agitated and wants to punish the initiators and their partners. That is why in most of traditional Africa there is a feeling that homosexuality was never there and that it is a new way of life that could be stamped out. Consequently, the type as we have just seen should be discouraged by the Church and even punished by the state. This may be the reason why some churches, particularly in Africa would issue out statements outlining their position concerning homosexuality that is being discussed in most African states.

Why Fear Homosexuality
Living things have to spread their seeds to maintain their existence even if they were to die at any time.  Those that were stronger or fitter dominated in the spread of their seeds were eventually dominant in any society or communities. We learn this from the survival of the fittest doctrine of Charles Darwin of normal men or the fittest strive to spread their seeds of procreation. To Darwin, the homosexuals or lesbians will eventually die out as per this explanation underlined by Nathar Tabor some of us are likely to concur:

Under Darwin's process of natural selection, all "beings" — as opposed to the outmoded religious idea of "creatures" — are continually adapting to their natural environment in order to have a better chance of surviving. The weakest and most poorly adapted die off, while the strongest and most improved survive long enough to mate. Their offspring inherit their genes, and thus the species improves from one generation to the next. Darwin "noted that successful species produce more offspring in each generation than are needed to replace the adults who die . . . The species would thus have changed or evolved to favor traits that favor survival and reproduction," ..This means that not only must these beings be able to reproduce sexually; they must actually do so, for evolution to work as posited. Under evolution, then, successful reproduction is the key. Homosexuals would cease to exist because their sexual practices are such that they do not produce natural offspring.” www.reewamerica.com/columns/tabor/050908.



In the human biological set up the females are fashioned to receive and take part in the fertility of their eggs. Under normal circumstances, an average or normal woman had that inherent urge to have and bring up children. Similarly, normal men had that enthusiasm to see their own kinds produced and would do all even to the extent of giving up their lives to protect their offspring. It is for this reason that none-procreative men were punished or even destroyed in some societies in the past and look on contemptuously in the present. As     said a good number of African states are still not in favor of homosexuality or lesbianism irrespective of any reasoning for their deviant sexual activities advanced by some authorities particularly in the West. In most societies, be they developed or primitive, homosexuality is not entertained as there is ever that feeling that the society would be increased in number for the mutual benefit of all. This was essential in the past and even hitherto as when it came to communal activities, defense of the state, agriculture, communal hunting,  gathering of food, etc., a society that was numerous stood a better chance of succeeding or staying alive. The man and woman who were fertile were welcome in any society as it was considered a blessing from God or what people of those days worshiped.  Therefore, men or women who were not in favor of procreation were not wanted in those societies. Some were even destroyed. We are getting out of that paradigm. 

Why Abnormality is disdained
With this background, it was considered an abnormality or danger to that society if women and men were not productive to the extent that since time immemorial those considered as patients of homosexuality were being treated www.bmj.com/content/328/7437/427.  It was for this reason that infertile men and women or patients, for whatever reasons were not even wanted in the society and their activities had to go underground as bootlegging in the old days in North America.  In some distance pass, they were sold into slavery or sold to be used for sacrifices or royal burials. For reasons we have seen, in most African societies nowadays, marriage may only be approved when the couple have proven that they were fertile. To be crown as a king in most ethnic communities in Africa, one of one's characteristics or criterion is for one to be fertile, fit, and where possible wealthy.  In the Western set up, one may just marriage for the sake of marriage, that is to have a life-long partner and the idea of procreation will not be the main reason why people marry. In that case, some true irreligious westerners will not see any reason why they should stand on the way of homosexuals who want to get marry whereas other will thwart this endeavor. Even then, it was a tabooed thing and still resented irrespective of the fact that some persons capitalize on this to have deviants' vote them in their election campaign http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/07/12/anti-gay-group-decides-slave-children-werent-really-better-off/

In the same vein, if it were discovered that the men and women were homosexuals, they were considered as outcast. Having sexual orientation to people of one's sex was therefore a hidden secret no one ever heard of it till those person died. Having said this, it was rumored that in the Hausa society, having homosexual activities were accepted for ritualistic purposes. This was exacerbated by the Sharia laws where men and women were not supposed to be together in the public and young girls had to be given to marriage. When it came to public transport women were supposed to take separate buses from men. In this ethnic group it was erroneously alleged that homosexual act made men to be rich. It was similar to the belief in some primitive societies in Southern Africa that having dalliance with a virgin or infants cured persons who were HIV positive. 

Fear of Parturition may create Lesbians. 
Where it was the case of the woman being homosexual, lesbian in the Nso ethnic society of the former British Cameroons, the woman was given a husband and elders supervised him having dalliance with his new wife. It was to ascertain that the act of procreation took place appropriately. Also, there were apprehensions that some women would not have contact with men for fear of parturition. So, there are isolated cases where women remained single, sexless and never had children for fear of childbirth pains. Similarly, if a man was suspected or discovered to be a homophile, he was similarly given a wife and the elders sat on vigil by the matrimonial bedside to ascertain that coitus was correctly performed and they made a child (vide: my old Shadows of Fire) that was written to store Nso fast-dying custom as a continuous narrative. At this juncture, it should be made clear that there were no pornographic videos, obscene films or pictures in those days that could be used to teach would-be parents who had not passed through the Western sort of education as today. Today, gathering information on sexual activities and dissemination of such information  among unprotected youths where texting and exchange of pornographic materials is relatively not prohibited or cannot be controlled have made sex education easier than before. Commercials on CNN and other North American media teach children obscenity as soon as they are able to under stand commercial language. They figure out what "Cialis or Viagra are for when the moment is ripe." But do these prevent or encourage MSMs and WSWs?

Ignorance
With the some societal negative views of homosexuality, one grew up to die in some African communities without coming across a homosexual or heard it being discussed. The nearest thing one heard being discussed in biology classes were hermaphrodites.  Anthropologists from the West who came to Africa to find out this deviant sexual activities gathered no information or witnessed nothing to their dismay. They would not come come across homosexuality but heterosexuality. I read Nigel Barley's book, The Innocent Anthropologist: Notes for a Mud Hut, 1983, British Museum Publication, a best-seller in which he was inquiring from youths in Northern Cameroon when a bull was trying to mount a bull for the children’s reaction. He was not far to use the animistic examples as some males animals used this to settle scores such as some dwarf chimpanzees, lions, dolphins, and so on http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718.. He was trying to elicit from them if there was such a thing in their society, Dowayos. He had to concluded that Africans were not used to homosexuality. His conclusion was drawn from a very small sample and his findings could have been taken with a pinch of salt.

Homosexuality and Economic Ramification
Furthermore, the society saw people or siblings as money. We still see them today as wealth. The economic graph for this may be different if quality is taken into consideration. The higher the population of a nation state, the higher its demand for goods and services, therefore the more wealth such an economy generated. On the quality of population, what may be considered as one poor family of four's economic consumption in Canada or North America may be equated to thirty families in some parts of Africa and S. E. Asian.  Apart from looking at it from the strength of consumption of commodities, if one were to invest in China or India the most populous nations on earth, one was likely to get good returns than say one where the population was scanty. If there were to be war or famine or any pandemic or epidemic diseases where millions were dying, the chances were that Chinese were to survive and would still  wax on unlike say Botswana that was only up to 2 098,018 (July 2012 est.) inhabitants.  If say there were pandemic diseases in the later, the entire population was likely to be wiped out and that would have been a sad day for that nation state. [This is just hypothetical and I should not be cited as a blogger wishing this to happen. This state is a good example where the income per capital is perhaps one of the highest in Africa owing to it production of diamonds (leading producer in the world) and it is a success story].In that case, if the people were not sexually productive, it was the concern of a caring society. 

Big family equals big demand plus productivity
Furthermore, if one was to have more children, one was to be spurred to work hard to bring them up the right way without leaving them to strain themselves. In some primitive societies, the grand size of your family became your wealth and consequently that of you society. Well, Westerners have to consider having a large family or scaling it down and having more money in their pockets for their homes or jalopies. The consequence has been a drastic shortage of labor in countries like Canada, Germany, and Switzerland to name just a few. They had to make up for this by exporting their industrial activities abroad or importing provisional or permanent labor forces from developing countries. The defect of importing ephemeral labor is that the workers tend not to invest in their new countries.  Secondly, they caused brain drainage and that could in the long run lead to more and more leaving their countries of origin to emigrate to Europe and North America. This attitude of getting foreign workers and consequences were demonstrated in Uganda where the British Colonial government brought in East Indians to work in the construction of the then British East African railways and work in fields. They eventually settled and did not wholehearted considered their host countries as theirs after some third or so generations. They were repatriating their wealth to their original mother country India and called themselves British Indians. In consequence the infamous General Idi Amin Dada (1971-1979), President of Uganda took drastic measures to repatriate Asians, particularly Indians and Pakistanis to leave in 90 days’ time to their original homes and that caused hardship and bitter feelings. Many of those expelled ended up in Canada and Great Britain but they still feel or saw Uganda as their home irrespective of having homes in Canada, UK, Australia and USA. Some eventually returned to Uganda with the coming of a democratic government of a level-headed President Yoweri Museveni.

Canada subtly solves its shortage of skill labor by importing semiskilled laborers from India and Pakistan and this is causing a stir in some service industries as banking and catering. The locals are deliberately kept out of jobs and foreigners who are paid a pittance are employed. The author knows of a Canadian trained PhD specialist in heat-seeking missiles who had been unemployed for donkey years. Bringing in semi skilled aliens to take up Canadian jobs is not taken lightly by the unemployed Canadian citizens. In the case of the USA, jobs are exported abroad as it is cheaper to pay foreign workers than to employ the locals. Also, locals can afford to stay unemployed for long as the one family-two-children-unannounced policy meant that the siblings could rely on the income of the parents for long and could also dictate to the employers the sort of jobs they want and even salaries. In the long run that will not be good for the Canadian economy that had to be competitive.    ....If it was defense, economic productivity, and demand for labor and so on, you were to provide positively.  Therefore, the society approved of what you were doing. On the contrary, if you were a homosexual, the society felt that you were not to be productive as they saw no motivation from the familial part of your life. You were considered like gypsies who roamed around and were not productive to higher capacity as the society expected them. For a homosexual or lesbian, the society would observed that after you, that is if you died from whatever causes, there was the end of your world and no one to succeed. It became a ridiculous situation where selfish individuals dedicated their wills to their pets and most critical societies did not take that kindly.  

Would homosexuals and lesbians be exonerated if they adopt heterosexual children?
Even if you adopted children, there was that feeling that you will not give in wholeheartedly to their upbringing as if they were your biological children. Serious studies have not been carried out on this and it is still at the state of wait-and-see before conclusions are drawn.  I am seeing many readers objecting to this as they may have successful cases lining up. They are telling me that we need to redefine the family as known naturally. Indeed, there were successes of pseudo-families, as there will be of homosexuals bringing up children or their pets but successes measured in terms of a true family made up of father, mother and children will not be there. If they are there, they are artificial and some sort of strain is left in the hearts and minds of the children who are unfortunately brought up by such a pseudo-families of MSM or WSW.  

It had been observed that some adopted children did not perform well in schools and often had the feeling is some cases that they were being mistreated because they were adopted or considered as not being biological children. They had seen that few or no homosexuals would die for such children. Often, where such children had the means, the quit such families when they had the slightest opportunity. I know of a case in London, UK where the adopted would not even attend the funeral of one of his adopted parents for reasons that they were too hawkish towards him.  Some children would not address their adopted parents as PAPA in the case of MSMs and mama in the case of WSWs as in a normal case, the moment they discovered that they had natural parents somewhere. Also, the children under their care did not feel that attachment as in their biological parents. 

Deviance
Additionally, the society felt that homosexual were selfish even though they advance the so-called scientific feelings that they were born the way they were. As said as recently as in 1992 there were still some physicians who believed that homosexuals were deviant patients and all sorts of psychological means were used to try to cure them.  Another intrigue was their lifestyle that was not conforming to what the society from a normal or a decent person. The society observes them and found out that they did not have a single partner they anchor to with whom they stayed for long till they die. They were promiscuous and changed partners at random and such behaviors put them on harm's way. Where children were entrusted in their care, even after knowing that those children were heterosexuals, they still tried hard to wore them into what others call sodomy. This was and is still true of teachers who are homosexuals or lesbians. This was not taken lightly and it is for this reasons that the debate over mixing normal and homosexual boys and girls guides in the USA is causing a stir. 
Putting all cards on the the table to be accepted and scouting
The patients or homosexuals are doing all they can to be accepted in the community of normal persons and would do anything out of desperation to be accepted. Should they work hard for this if they are naturally born the way they are? They may be given green light as is apparently the case. Does it imply that they were not to be tempted not to woo normal children into their net for sexual gratifications? This type of pervert is called a child molester. Would you give him room to lead your boy guides because you sympathize with the way he was "born"? He fully knows that the children or men he wants to woo are normal yet he goes on.  Will he be fair or shall we sit by and witch because we want to get him into the realm of normal persons? That is another point of contention that must be debated. It is for this reason that parents must ensure that normal persons are in scouting camps and jamborees and not to be hoodwinked. It should be mentioned here that some persons may join the scouting movement as their way of getting more gay friends. Nothing wrong in this but that will negate the purpose of scouting and scout movement. It is not a forum designed for like sexes to chum up. It is not a bar or ballroom dance where songsters ululate beguines and people looking for sexual gratifications congregate. In the modern set up when it concerned sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) homosexuals, men having sex with men, (MSM) were seen to harbor or distribute more of these than heterosexual men and women http://www.bilerico.com/2010/03/us_gay_mens_astonishing_hivstd_rates.php. That triggered the question why if the children entrusted in their hands will not copy what they were doing and similarly become promiscuous. 

Some MSM marriages are morganatic and a travesty of marriage as found in the New Testament
This is a strong statement that me underline my that I am not a proponent irrespective of some sympathy demonstrated. It was also considered that MSM relentless fight to have legality of their wedding approved was simply for economic partnership and not in the real matrimonial sense we have in most heterosexual relationship. Some still continued having partners outside their wedding domain. It was therefore in consequential to equate their marriage to that of normal persons or heterosexuals. To be on the safe side and for our record, we will call it economic cum sexual union of MSMs or WSWs.  ....When pushing hard on this question of homosexuality particularly when it comes to lesbianism, some persons argue that most women are lesbians and that prior to getting married they would have lesbian affairs with other girls. In the society that may be considered as primitive, it had been observed by the grandees that some women were shy or feared men and the only way to do away with pusillanimity was to give away their girls in marriage at an earlier age. This is the case in some African and Islamized societies. Also, where there is bride price, the parents want to ascertain that they get some money for having raised their girls. In that case it was to their advantage to get the girls chum up with the right male suitors they wanted that were eligible financially.  It means someone who was to pay for their bride price. A woman suitor was not likely to pay this sort of money. In societies under consideration, women were not generally rich. You will not have rich women in any primitive Islamic society as one, they do not allow their women to venture engaged in some trade or education that will liberate them. Therefore, there was no question of getting women to pay for bride price so as to marry other women. In that case lesbianism, if at all it existed was only confined in the harems and not outside. 

End word
These issues were similarly examined in the past and it was concluded that homosexuality was not good for the society and their future was relatively guaranteed.  When it came to defense, men and women fought gallantly to defend their children, and hence their society. If there were no children people were fighting to leave their tradition with, there was lack or no incentive in fighting and they ended up being in the jaws of their enemy. If there were children to inherit property, the owners worked harder with the belief that in the end, the children were not to leave their wealth and start from scratch or go about begging. They were further motivated to put in their best performances. These attitudes were good for the economy in which they lived and the world at large. You are now seeing what motivated the NAZI party in Hitler’s Germany to go on the rampage of homosexuals and other ne'er-do-wells in their societies. [Once more dear readers, by making this statement, I am not suggesting that it should be the case in the modern society of the 21st century. It is for us to understand what might have spurred the killing and hatred of the homosexuals in some societies so that such should never ever happen]. 

Having made these statements, most Western Churches that follow the Holy Bible on which most of the Western laws are pivoted, did not and still grudgingly do not approve of homosexual activities. Some states  will even imprison those promoting homosexual propaganda as in Russia today http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2013/06/2013611155323341978.html. Nevertheless, they may be  accepted as sort of mavericks. The wedding of two healthy men (MSM) in France a couple of days ago to the chagrin of many was considered as anathema. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6c1a1cde-c877-11e2-8cb7-00144feab7de.html#axzz2UyZZVy3D.  Finally, there are certain things man will be forced  or inveigled to accept but deep within him, he is convinced that they are all wrong and he will stand stoically by his convictions till he is called to heaven. Still to many, homosexuality is one of them. Modern states, vogue, some religions, or philosophies, or inveiglers may advocate euthanasia, homosexuality and abortion, and may use their persuasive skills as some persons in jurisprudence do, vice, force or buy reasoning peoples to side with them and their apparent contradictory views, nevertheless, the naked truth is that deep in their hearts, minds and prayers, they will never be in favor of their action or equate their union with holy matrimony as sanctified by God. It will never be wholehearted voted for even when it even comes to rotten boroughs. I will join those who refuse to join this queue of the modern savants irrespective of all persuasions, threats, cajoles, and worldly sympathies that are detached from God who loves the examined, believers, none-believers and sinners. As persons proven to be born that way beyond reasonable doubts and scientifically proven, I will stand by them.  When it comes to marriage sacrament as in the true church instituted by Jesus Christ, I will love them as my brothers and sisters and never their perverse sexual activities. 

Viban Viban Ngo, PhD.
vibanngo@hotmail.com
[PS: As this is still a drafted treatise, readers citing or reviewing it may have to acknowledge or seek the consent of the author.]



Powered By Blogger
Powered By Blogger

Blog Archive

About Me

About the Author: Viban Viban NGO, a Canadian You may contact him for further information by writing to him on Email vibanngo@yahoo.com URL http://www.flagbookscanadainternationalinc.com