In an attempt to reply to your inquiry I wish to draw you attention and those of our dear readers to the following fact about the place name IVORY COAST, many do not know. Ivory Coast whose present generation would like to impose its French appellation Cote d'Ivoire on English-speaking peoples for lack of a proper African or indigenized regionym, was at the epoch of slavery and slave trade (1400-1900) a very lucrative region in Western Africa in the supply of slaves. Western Africa was variously known as Guinea, Western Sudan, Negroland or Nigritia. In those days (1400-1900) slave dealers could buy white or black ivories. The white ivories were elephant tusks and black ivories were sadly, black skinned Africans. In consequence, the designation Ivory Coast is a way European slavers and to some extent Arabs immortalized the despicable lucrative trade in human beings and not only ivory tusks as must of you erroneously believe.
Some Ivoirians are of the opinion that by masking the phrase regionym Ivory Coast with the gallicized Côte d'Ivoire they could get away with the past opprobrium of slavery and slave harvesting in the region. They are wrong. Peter in English or Pierre in French still stands for the scriptural 'rock' and nothing more. By playing with words, you do NOT alter the meaning.
In my book published in 2009 entitled Origins of African Place Names: An Introduction to Toponymy and Politics in Africa, Ottawa: Bianco Publishing, 699 pages, I have underscored shameful colonial legacies in place names on African maps that must be expurgated to give Africans a new face-lift and Ivory Coast is one of them. I suggested to the citizens of that country to adopt Songhay as Gold Coast once adopted Ghana on the eve of their independence. Alternatively, I suggested names of major natural features in that country that could be adopted and adapted, among which were Sassandria, Bandamia and Komoestan.
I considered these more authentic than the opprobrious Côte d'Ivoire/Ivory Coast that remains us each time we pronounce it of the shame of slavery and slaver trade that hitherto put African as inferior humans in the eyes of rosy and yellow races. I went on that IVORY COAST or translated into any language was and is still and 'irritating anachronism or a misnomer' that Africans of good will at home and in the Diaspora had to do all they could to expurgate from all maps and atlases of the world.
So Marika Sherwood, Ivory Coast was not and cannot be exonerated from the debasing human trade, slave trade that laid the seed of colonialism, neocolonialism and what is subtly known as globalization today. Historical evidence to substantiate this is overwhelming. In fact, a sensitive person from this region who is aware of this should even be ashamed of calling himself or herself an Ivorian. It is another way of saying SLAVE. Exhuming slavery and any that reminds us of that appalling phrase in the history of man must be locked and keyed. Furthermore, if my first language is German and we have a way of calling a place name in German, I do not see the reason why citizens of that country or place would want me to leave my language and use theirs when I want to write or call the name of that country. In the French atlas map, Ivory Coast will be Cote d'Ivoire but in an English atlas or map as had been before we do not see any scientific season why all of a sudden the English would be corrected to call Ivory Coast, COTE D'IVOIRE. That name is humiliating to those who know its origin. Are Africans not ashamed of being last lots of developments in the world.
Dr. Viban Ngo,
The author is a toponymist and writer of the following books: Before You Leave For Europe and North America: A Rough Companion Guide for -African- Students (2007) AuthorHouse, Indiana, USA and Origins of African Place Names (2009), Bianco Publishing, Ottawa, Canada; etc.
> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:17:43 +0000
> From: beckerleschar@ORANGE.SN
> Subject: Ivory Coast Elections: REPLY
> To: H-WEST-AFRICA@H-NET.MSU.EDU
>
> From: "Marika Sherwood"
> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:57:05 -0000
>
> -------------------
>
> So colonialism has much to do with what goes on today. But did the trade in
> the enslaved to the North also exclude today's Ivory Coast?